Cambridge Audio Vs Onkyo
Cambridge Audio Vs Onkyo. I don't have a separate phono preamp, but all of these have a built in one. Cambridge audio azur 540a vs.
The onkyo, if i remember right, is 44w/ch. Cambridge audio topazam10 vs yamaha as300 vs onkyo a9050? Cambridge is of course nice kit but the price on that cxn streamer is stupid high.
But Who Knows, Maybe It Was The Speakers, Or The Room.
But that is just the baseline, and you can go a lot further if you want to splurge. I don't have a separate phono preamp, but all of these have a built in one. Specs don't say it all?
The Naim Uniti Atom And The Nad M10.
Given everyone's focus on home theater, would they still make a decent integrated am. No dac in the uk. Nad c320bee tested at £220.
Cambridge Audio Axc35 Cd Player In Stock.
The cxa81 has a warmer, more refined sound than the cxa61. The onkyo 803 is 4 ohm stable and can easily drive the maggies. Cambridge is of course nice kit but the price on that cxn streamer is stupid high.
With A Budget Under £200, I'm Not Sure You Can Do Better Than The Yamaha As301.
As mentioned both amps are 4 ohm stable and able to drive the mmgs. I've owned such an onkyo before and found the network capability quite convenient (to control the unit via an iphone app), but remembering my old cambridge audio azur 540r, i'm wondering whether the ca topaz would be trump the. The onkyo 9110 has higher snr and a decent amp.
The Cambridge Topaz Am10 Is 35W/Ch.
I have never heard a ca setup sound warm to me at all. We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. It's needless to say, the marantz is a consumer av.
Post a Comment for "Cambridge Audio Vs Onkyo"